Is the group more important than the individual? This is a hard question for many to answer. If you were to ask me, I would say yes and no. To you, your family might be more important than you, but do you think that a group of thugs are more important than yourself?

Yes, in some cases the group is more important than one person. When there is a group of civilians stuck in a fire and one guy is in another area, the firefighters are going to get the group first. Also when there is a bunch of people rigged with C4 in a bank compared to a dude at gunpoint in an alley, the cops are going to the bank. So yes the group can be more important.

Then again, one person can be and is equal to everyone else. The president came into the world the same way a hobo that wastes money at a liquor did. God made everyone equally like cops and the S.W.AT. team or terrorist and rapist. Everyone gets the same life, it depends on how well they take care of it.

Created by Oatmeal

HAHA!! TAKE THAT YA FREAK OF NATURE!

Myspace OUT, Facebook IN?

Myspace has recently been updated and now there are many people who are unhappy about the big changes. Myspace is no longer 'Myspace' but now ' my__'. Get it?

And now they have a lot of new and so-called "improved" things. For example, your profile might be a bit more difficult(or not, depending on you)And a background might be harder to find. Many users have friended a profile that opposes the newer version and threatens to leave Myspace unless it is changed back to the original version.

lately I've been hearing many people talk about Facebook as if it has replaced Myspace. I have asked an Anonymous female who believes that this is exactly the case.

" Of course Facebook replaced Myspace. Myspace is too complicated now. Facebook is kinda' like the new 'it' website now. Before, I guess it was a little lame, I mean I didn't have one and now I do. Ever since Myspace changed, Facebook looks better to me. So in my opinion, Facebook IS better."

Do YOU agree with Anonymous?Or will you stick with Myspace through thick and thin?

Discuss & comment. . . I'd love to hear your input.

~Cassie.Jay~

Should People Have and Accept Their "Roles?"

People sometimes say that we have "roles" to play in our lives and should just accept what we "have" to do. I think otherwise. If people just accepted doing whatever small things they do then we wouldn't have had all the great people that helped shape our world today. If Thomas Edison had accepted that he couldn't make a light bulb then we wouldn't have the electricity we have today. And if you strive to do more, than you can accomplish more and change your "role."

If you want to see an example of a "role" in life then check this site out.(beware it oddly has one curse word in the middle of all these smart words...) This site explains some of the roles considered for men and women along with what is usually done now. It's shown on a chart lower on the page, but above half of the page.

So we've went from many specific types of people usually doing the same thing in life to people doing whatever they would love to do. You can change your "role" so you don't have to accept it. Why would you accept something when you can easily make better of it then accept it? You can choose your own "role" and change it whenever.

Individual or the Group

Do you mean nothing? Do your couragous actions get thrown to the curb for the "group". I say NO, you should, you shouldn't have to stand around while everyone else in class or in your club takes there time. You should be able to work at your own pace without having to hold on because everyone else doesn't get it yet. One of the things someone said about this is that the individual gets to clean up their own mess and thats just what I think. Even though it could be good to let people catch but if the whole group is slow you should be ablework on your own. I mean if you want to.

Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic Review

This game is a bit older and the graphics may be a bit bad for now-a-days but I still love to play the game. It's a fun, action, RPG game. It has a great storyline and many choices to make and very fun battles. The game takes place way, way back very far before any of the Star Wars movies you know. And sorry but to tell you what it is about I will have to spoil a surprise that's near the end. You used to be Darth Revan, Dark Lord of the Sith. A Jedi named, Bastilla, had captured you while your apprentice, Darth Malak, saw an opportunity to kill you by firing at your ship. You were brought back to the Jedi Order and your mind and identity has been erased. From then on you make good or evil decision distributing to Light side points and Dark side points. The further to the Dark side you are, the uglier and more gruesome you look

Now you don't know you're Revan until your first face off with Malak(funny thing: I heard Darth Revan before I had this game, named my character Darth Revan, and then figured out that I was Darth Revan. If you are good you can say:"I'm not Darth Revan anymore. Now I'm Darth Revan." So that was a funny experience.). But overall the side quests and story and all the things you can do in the game are amazing. I would have to rate it a 9/10.